The Lowdown on the New Google Sites
Here’s the lowdown on the New Google Sites: The Good, The Bad, and Nothing Ugly! As I mentioned in an earlier post, There’s a New Google Sites Coming, what is now being referred to as the “classic” Google Sites was long overdue for an update. I usually referred to Google Sites as an acquired taste because it was so antiquated and most users are turned off within the first few minutes of trying it. However, “classic,” sites was and is still a powerful tool for teachers and students. The new Sites is slick and beautiful, and very easy to use, BUT it is still missing some of the features that make the “classic” sites so powerful.
Both classic sites and the new Google Sites are available now, so to help you decide whether you are ready to make the leap to the new Sites. And given that the new Google Sites biggest strength is the beautiful design, I am breaking this down into The New Google Sites: The Good, The Bad, and Nothing Ugly.
First of all, Google doesn’t want you making ugly sites! Yep! It’s all but impossible to make an ugly site with the new design features in Google Sites. You have to use a theme, which includes a set of colors, fonts and other design elements that cannot be customized.
[Tweet “The Good, The Bad, and Nothing Ugly About the New Google Sites #SUL #googleedu #gttribe”]
Accessing the new Google Sites is even easier now that it’s a part of Google Drive. Create a new Google Site from the “New,” button in Drive. You will also see your sites listed in Google Drive. (Sweet!)
You can also access via the new homepage, which looks similar to other Google Drive counterparts’ homepages: sites.google.com/new. If you still see the classic sites homepage, you can click on “New Google Sites,” from the menu.
One of the most confusing parts of classic sites is navigation. The new Google Sites has a very simple and clean navigation. Google has made use of the same design elements we see in other products, like using the predictable three lines to represent the menu and the three dots to represent more actions.
The new Google Sites is a responsive design website, meaning it will adjust and resize to the size of the screen on your device–a much-needed update! Responsive design means this will be easier for students to view on mobile devices. You can click on the preview button (eye icon at the top of the page) to see what your site will look like published. There are also icons in the bottom-right to let you preview how it will look on tablets and phones.
So remember, Google is making it hard to make an ugly Google Site. Part of that requirement is the use of themes. They are clean, professional, and combine complementary colors, fonts, etc. This makes formatting a breeze! Classic Sites requires a lot of work to create something that is not only clean but beautiful.
Click and Drag Editing
To add elements to your pages, simply click and drag what you want onto the page. This is how you add text, images, embed Google Drive files, etc. Easy peasy!
I have gotten used to my auto-saving Google Docs, Slides…everything! So it always felt antiquated and cumbersome to have to remember to click, “save,” in classic sites. Auto-save in the new Google Sites is expected and greatly appreciated. (Keep in mind that although your site will auto-save, it doesn’t auto-publish. You will have to publish your site for others to view.)
Create a Site in Minutes
With everything so streamlined and easy to navigate, you can create a site with little to no training in just a few minutes. I like things that save me time!
Very Little Customization
With forced themes, fonts, formatting, you have very little room to customize. You can upload your own header images, but not the kind of control and customization that we have come to love about classic Google Sites.[Tweet “What’s still missing in the New Google Sites? #SUL #gttribe #googleedu”]
What’s Missing (and it’s a lot!)
- Editing HTML and CSS
- No true embed code
- No page types, which means no blog page, no file cabinet option, etc.
- No external links in the navigation
- No table of contents option
- Nesting of pages is limited to one level, meaning one level of subpages.
- Editing still requires the desktop version of Chrome or Firefox.
While technically there isn’t anything ugly about the new Google Sites because they actually have made it hard to make an ugly Google Site, but the missing features will make it hard for me to make the switch just yet. I use Google Sites for workshops and training, and I just can’t do the things that I need to do.
I will forgo the beauty of the new sites for the features I need until Google gives us more of what’s missing. What about you? Have you made the switch? Please share in the comments.
[Tweet “Here are some great resources to help get started with the New Google Sites! #SUL #gttribe #googleedu”]
Resources for Learning the New Google Sites:
- Google Sites Cheat Sheet (1-pager from Google)
- New Google Sites videos, podcasts, and resources from TeacherCast.
- New Google Sites Cheat Sheet from Jenn Judkins.
- Christy Fennewald has put together this great Google Slides presentation that really will tell you everything you need to know to get started.
- Eric Curts created this wonderful, one-hour, tutorial video.
Coming Soon! The Google Certified Educator Academy!
Ready to get become a Google Certified Educator in 2017? Shake Up Learning will be offering online courses to help you prepare for the Level 1 and Level 2 exams. Join this exclusive email list and get your FREE download: How to Pass the Google Certified Educator Exams. You will be the first to know about these courses and when they will be released. Stay tuned for more! The home for information about the new Google Certified Educator Academy can be found here: GoogleCertifiedEducator.com.
Check out all of the Google Certification Resources from Shake Up Learning.
© Shake Up Learning 2023. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Kasey Bell and Shake Up Learning with appropriate and specific direction to the original content on ShakeUpLearning.com. See: Copyright Policy.
I have switched to the new sites for some things, but kept the old for others. For my sites that don’t require the advanced features of the old sites, I find the ease of creating a website using new Google is perfect.
I also have been showing my teachers the new Google Sites and encouraging them to try it. Most do not want or need to use the advanced features and they appreciate the ease of the new Google sites.
Kristal Doolin says
I love what we have so far with new sites, but I am missing the ability to make a template and copy it to students for e-portfolios. Ironically, I had just started working on e-portfolios as a new option for my district. I’m REALLY hoping this missing feature is added before we go to full implementation. It would be so much easier for students to manage with the new sites!
Cyndi Furr says
Teachers who want a very simple page are using new sites, but those will more complex needs (including whole school websites) are sticking with the old for now.
Lisa Herr says
I love the drag and drop feature. I was able to create a tutorial website “lickety split”, as we say in Texas. I do miss some of the embed features!!
One point of correction to your list of what you can’t do: you can hide pages – see https://goo.gl/tR6iDk.
We have made a full comparison chart from classic Google Sites – see Google Sites Classic Comparison https://goo.gl/tC82OS. On that page we offer a number of how to videos looking at the features on new Google Sites in depth. We also offer a group you can join so you get email notifications when new features are released. Please let us know what you think and if you feel there’s anything missing let us know.
TAMMY BURNS says
I agree with what you said about not switching quite yet. I got in and played with it and I really missed the HTML customization. There are just some things you’ve got to manipulate the HTML and other things and I really like to have that capability.
Joanne Schmutz says
I agree and am sticking with the classic sites right now. I showed my students the new sites a few weeks ago to let them just play with it and right away they missed all the customization they can do in the classic sites. I hear rumors classic sites will go away, but I don’t understand why they would take the option to use it away someday. If it doesn’t really need any support as they haven’t updated anything on classics sites in forever, I don’t understand why it can’t just stay an option. There is a lot to do to the new sites to allow us to transfer our classic sites over to it. The future will be interesting, and I’m excited to continue to watch New Sites grow.